March 27, 2006
Lordy, Lordy, Lordy
Maybe our expectations were lowered by the barrage of bad reviews published on Friday, but colour us Elvish, because we were surprised to find how thoroughly we enjoyed Lord of the Rings last night. We should probably admit our biases up front, though. First of all, we've never read the books and we've only seen the first movie. Gasp in horror if you must, but we have no plans to change this state of affairs. Second of all, we love musicals. We really love musicals. We especially love when musicals are fashioned from obviously inappropriate source material. In truth, we were secretly hoping for tap dancing orcs (don't worry, there are no tap dancing orcs - damnit!). Finally, we are a sucker for a good wind machine effect. So we may, in fact, be the ideal audience for this spectacle - unconcerned with the purity of the adaptation and just out for a good time.
And a good time is there for the having, despite what all the mean old critics are saying (frankly, we're not convinced that they didn't all go in determined to hate the show in the first place). It's sweet and likeable before the curtain even comes up, with Hobbits racing around chasing fireflies and dancing as the audience finds their seats. Sure, Lord of the Rings is not a perfect show by any means. We can't comment on how faithfully the story was adapted, but it isn't difficult to follow for us Middle-earth virgins. The main focus is on the friendship between Frodo (James Loy) and Sam (Peter Howe), a wise decision on the part of the writers as it gives the show a solid heart, though at the expense of anyone else's character development (the love story between Arwen and Aragorn is perfunctory at best, and Eowyn's appearance is little more than a cameo). The actors playing the hobbits are charming and likeable in their roles, and admirably tackle the difficult task of not being Elijah Wood and Sean Astin. The rest of the cast is quite good as well. The major disappointment is Brent Carver as Gandalf - he's just too subtle an actor to pull off such an archetypal role, and he just isn't believable as a great and terrible wizard, especially when he's up against Richard MacMillan's awesome performance as Sarumen. Michael Therriault's writhing Gollum is another stand out performance.
Technically, the show is undeniably spectacular. The revolving stage is made up of at least sixteen pieces that can be raised and lowered independently of one another in order to create all manner of landscapes. The lighting is spectacular, and there's an appearance by a giant spider that is worthy of Julie Taymor. The acrobatic-fuelled battle scenes are impressive, though they occasionally drag a little (and once or twice lapse into a ridiculous bit of choreography - orcs pelvic thrusting? Really?), but most eye-popping of all are the first and second act finales. Director Matthew Warchus sure does know how to stage a climactic cliff-hanger!
Cheesy and overwrought? Yes. But it's a musical, and it's Lord of the Rings - cheesy and overwrought are what it's all about!



starlight express answer me YES! musicals are supposed to be cheese. i tell people that all the time in defense of rent and phantom of the opera and south pacific. but no one ever listens to me.
We have the same thoughts, down to the exact same use of the word perfunctory. I can understand a bad review, but I'm not sure why Ouzounian and Kamal were so devastating. Also, Ben Brantley's a big meanie...
I am also not a Tolkien fan and have no plans to read the books or finish watching the movies either. I wonder if that played a role in our enjoying it?
Meh! Aside from the mechanical set and the Gollum performance, the whole spectacle made little impression on me. I felt that James Loy's voice was painfully annoying and that there was entirely too much dialogue. I mean for a musical, it was surprisingly absent of music.
After seeing the Canadian Opera Company's conlusion of Wagner's "The Ring" series the previous weekend, I felt LOTR didn't come close to matching up.
But for an evening out, you could do a lot worse. I just left with the same sort of feeling you have when you leave an average movie. Perhaps the momentum leading to the opening got my hopes too high.
"I am also not a Tolkien fan and have no plans to read the books or finish watching the movies either. I wonder if that played a role in our enjoying it?"
I enjoyed the show because I have no interest in the its content? That's the best explanation of people who like musicals I've ever heard.
You haven't read the books or seen the whole movie trilogy?! **gasps in horror**
Musicals don't have to be cheese. In fact, the best ones aren't. Just look at the work of Sondheim: cynicism at its wittiest.
I AM looking forward to this "Theatrical Experience," though (the marketing team has been stressing that it's NOT a musical, more a play with music). Sad to hear about Brent Carver, but I always thought that he was well-intentionally miscast; he doesn't quite have the Shakespearean regality for the role of Gandalf.
A calculation for the critics
When will Ouzounian, Kamal and the like understand that if they slam every show that comes to Toronto, people won't buy tickets. If they don't buy tickets, the shows close early. If the shows close early, they lose money. If they lose money...no more shows.
No more shows = Nothing to review.
Nothing to review = No jobs for critics.
Need I say more?
That's moronic. A critic's job isn't to push a show -- that's what Mirvish's marketing team is for. A critic's job is to call it as it is. It's in their job description to review what is right and wrong about a production, so that the reader can decide whether (s)he wants to see it.
If Kamal and Ouzounian were to follow ulterior motives, they would be diminishing their own respectability as theatre critics.
"If Kamal and Ouzounian were to follow ulterior motives, they would be diminishing their own respectability as theatre critics." ...
And since it cannot be dimished any further, their motives MUST be pure.
Canadian musical is not actually a musical nor a play it's a mixture.